Jun10th

The Sporting News Doesn't Think Very Highly of the Purple

AUTHOR: danzinski | IN: Vikings | COMMENTS: 4 Comments

The Sporting News has come out with its predictions for the various divisions.  They see the NFC North shaping up this way:

  • Green Bay 11-5
  • Chicago 10-6
  • Minnesota 9-7
  • Detroit 3-13

Hold on a second while I get done laughing at that Lions prediction…

Okay, now back to the Vikings.  9-7?  I guess I can understand it.  Nobody’s sold on Tarvaris Jackson yet.  The receiver corps has issues.  We don’t have a tight end.  I’m not going to get too upset about such a pick.

Um…but the Bears at 10-6?  Based on what?  Their dynamic quarterback?  Their young, never-injured defense?  Their awesome receivers?  Their depth at running back?  Sorry but I don’t get it.  Put the Bears side-by-side with the Vikings and tell me where the Bears are a game better than them.  Can you even argue that the Bears have the superior defense at this point?  How did they play last year?  Did Brian Urlacher get a year younger?  Didn’t he have surgery in the off-season?

That one puzzles me…way more than even the Packers being picked at 11-5.  If Aaron Rodgers plays well?  Yeah, I can see the Packers having a nice season.  But if he doesn’t…forget about 11-5.

4 Comments on The Sporting News Doesn't Think Very Highly of the Purple

  1. da2213viking28 says:

    9-7 are u kiddin me. man can we start the season already and silence all the haters please. i cant handle to much more of this bull swag. holla at ya boi. my prediction 13-3. we’ll lose to the colts. once to the packers and once to the jags. but thats it mane. theres not seven teams that can beat us on our schedule.

  2. AustinVike says:

    Yeah, 9-7 has got to be a joke.  I have the feeling that we’ll give up one or two to teams that we should be able to beat – and this will be due to injuries late in the season (or locking down a playoff spot and playing all our 2nd team players).

    I’d hate to see us lose to the Jags, especially with the Williamson trade – we just have to win that one for the sake of posterity.

    The Colts are tough, but I think we might be able to pull out a win.  Maybe Chilly will run a 1930’s style single-wing offense and the Colts will be totally caught off guard by it.  Or Jared Allen (or Ray Edwards) will run back a fumble for a TD in the closing minutes of the game.

    Who knows??

    9-7…no frickin way.

  3. Zach says:

    Why they are hating. I think your division might be one of the weakest besides the Vikes. Although, the Packers could be pretty good again if Aaron Rodgers can fill-in. The Bears will suck though.

  4. 755em1 says:

    On the one hand, the Vikings getting no respect is irritating. 

    On the other hand, it could be a very good thing for the Vikings to be underrated going into the season.

    I am puzzled at what would make anyone think the Bears will be 10-6 in 2008, but why do people think the Lions will be as awful as 3-13?  That’s truly horrible, and it seems as excessively pessimistic as the projection for the Bears is optimistic.

Join The Discussion