Comments on: Culpepper Turned Down the Packers

By: davedallasfan

davedallasfan — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:39:54 +0000

i just think that culpepper was the starter and even when moss left he could have done fine with you guys. you still tried the same offensive scheme, with no MOSS. that was the problem. not culpepper, no moss. if culppy would have had a running game developed for him he would have been effective. the vikes tried to keep him going down field with NOTHING to throw down field to. no carter, no moss, what the hell did they think was going to happen to him at that point? hell with moss and carter, I could have completed a damn pass in that offence! minn. made a mistake, they pulled the plug to soon on him, and then gave him away. i live in n.iowa and hear and breathe viking shit around here all day long. most of the fans around this area think the same, the “press” made it sound as though people wanted him gone, they were actually in shock when he was. and most here now feel uneasy about jackson. they talk big but in their guts they lack the confidence in him. i go to one game every year at the dome, and the fans scream to get his ass out of there at every game. they’ll be howlin this year for booty, just watch and see.

By: da2213viking28

da2213viking28 — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 02:58:14 +0000

man culpepper was good for one reason dude. Randy moss. his numbers are horrible since losing his only target. and dont blame the knee either. theres a reason hes back up

By: davedallasfan

davedallasfan — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:15:30 +0000

i think you guys are the one that made the mistake. you think you got a qb now in jackson????? culpepper was better and you all know it. the joke around the league is, “favre retires, and hell, greenbay still has the best qb in the nfc north, and he’s never started.” it ain’t me sayin it, it’s everyone else. and you guys want to knock culpepper???? yeah, right. hope booty was a good pick, cause your gonna need him