<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s time to play the rookie!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thevikingage.com/2011/10/09/its-time-to-play-the-rookie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thevikingage.com/2011/10/09/its-time-to-play-the-rookie/</link>
	<description>A Minnesota Vikings Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomSimano</title>
		<link>http://thevikingage.com/2011/10/09/its-time-to-play-the-rookie/comment-page-1/#comment-10560</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSimano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevikingage.com/?p=7041#comment-10560</guid>
		<description>@tuckerbjt This is true, I&#039;m also in the playing to win category, really not matter the record.  I enjoy the Vikings, and regardless of record I am rooting for them to win.  If we finished 7-9, and 2 of our victories were against the Packers, that would be damn cool.  Ok, one victory and I&#039;d be happy.  If we are getting a little better week by week then cool, play to win, otherwise you are right, the veterans check out.

 

All has been quiet on the Ponder front, we&#039;ve not heard anything about his development, so we don&#039; t know how where he&#039;s at, maybe he is overloaded at this point. 

 

I guess for me the best time for a change would be during the bye week, give the rookie extra time to prepare...if it&#039;s going to happen, that is when we will see a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tuckerbjt This is true, I&#8217;m also in the playing to win category, really not matter the record.  I enjoy the Vikings, and regardless of record I am rooting for them to win.  If we finished 7-9, and 2 of our victories were against the Packers, that would be damn cool.  Ok, one victory and I&#8217;d be happy.  If we are getting a little better week by week then cool, play to win, otherwise you are right, the veterans check out.</p>
<p>All has been quiet on the Ponder front, we&#8217;ve not heard anything about his development, so we don&#8217; t know how where he&#8217;s at, maybe he is overloaded at this point. </p>
<p>I guess for me the best time for a change would be during the bye week, give the rookie extra time to prepare&#8230;if it&#8217;s going to happen, that is when we will see a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuckerbjt</title>
		<link>http://thevikingage.com/2011/10/09/its-time-to-play-the-rookie/comment-page-1/#comment-10559</link>
		<dc:creator>tuckerbjt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevikingage.com/?p=7041#comment-10559</guid>
		<description>My feelings on this topic have flipped and flopped every week. Right now, I don&#039;t see the utility in throwing Ponder in. I&#039;m not much for the &quot;let&#039;s see what we&#039;ve got&quot; mentality. There are veterans on this team that I would like to keep around and playing hard for a few years...and, honestly, in the modern NFL, who can say that Minnesota couldn&#039;t rip off a winning streak? I agree: that sounds ridiculous right now. But we&#039;ve seen weird things happen. (I don&#039;t mean they would go 12-4 and win the super bowl, but would any of us be upset if they went 7-9 and this year? I would be pretty happy considering how we started.)

 

The offensive line was very good against Arizona, but pretty bad the rest of the year, and I&#039;m not ready to trust them just yet. Please don&#039;t let Ponder get beat up.

 

I am a proponent of &quot;playing to win,&quot; even when your team is 1-4 and realistically has no chance to catch the top two teams in your division. In this case, I feel comfortable trusting Frazier; Leslie is at practice every day, so he knows where Ponder&#039;s development is. Leslie knows the pulse of the locker room, so I trust that he is considering how it would affect the team. I think it is sort of tragic when young guys get thrust in before they are ready; granted I dont know if Ponder is ready....I just dont want to find out the hard way. I also worry that we will put him in and then make him run the Tarvaris Jackson offense: run run, play action short pass....run run, play action short pass... That&#039;s not how you &quot;see what you&#039;ve got,&quot; that&#039;s how you stunt a QBs growth and stunt your offense in the process. If I could somehow get a guarantee that Musgrave and Frazier would really let Ponder loose, I&#039;d be OK....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feelings on this topic have flipped and flopped every week. Right now, I don&#8217;t see the utility in throwing Ponder in. I&#8217;m not much for the &#8220;let&#8217;s see what we&#8217;ve got&#8221; mentality. There are veterans on this team that I would like to keep around and playing hard for a few years&#8230;and, honestly, in the modern NFL, who can say that Minnesota couldn&#8217;t rip off a winning streak? I agree: that sounds ridiculous right now. But we&#8217;ve seen weird things happen. (I don&#8217;t mean they would go 12-4 and win the super bowl, but would any of us be upset if they went 7-9 and this year? I would be pretty happy considering how we started.)</p>
<p>The offensive line was very good against Arizona, but pretty bad the rest of the year, and I&#8217;m not ready to trust them just yet. Please don&#8217;t let Ponder get beat up.</p>
<p>I am a proponent of &#8220;playing to win,&#8221; even when your team is 1-4 and realistically has no chance to catch the top two teams in your division. In this case, I feel comfortable trusting Frazier; Leslie is at practice every day, so he knows where Ponder&#8217;s development is. Leslie knows the pulse of the locker room, so I trust that he is considering how it would affect the team. I think it is sort of tragic when young guys get thrust in before they are ready; granted I dont know if Ponder is ready&#8230;.I just dont want to find out the hard way. I also worry that we will put him in and then make him run the Tarvaris Jackson offense: run run, play action short pass&#8230;.run run, play action short pass&#8230; That&#8217;s not how you &#8220;see what you&#8217;ve got,&#8221; that&#8217;s how you stunt a QBs growth and stunt your offense in the process. If I could somehow get a guarantee that Musgrave and Frazier would really let Ponder loose, I&#8217;d be OK&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomSimano</title>
		<link>http://thevikingage.com/2011/10/09/its-time-to-play-the-rookie/comment-page-1/#comment-10557</link>
		<dc:creator>TomSimano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevikingage.com/?p=7041#comment-10557</guid>
		<description>Scott, I&#039;m with ya&#039; man, I thought the same thing last week, give the ball to Ponder, give him 5 games, if he flops or is not showing anything, put in Webb.  I do want to keep McNabb, as a veteran he should know that getting benched isn&#039;t the end of the world for him.

 

However, yesterday Aromashodu and Jenkins have showed some things, and Percy is always a good WR.  If there is a rhythm established, and Percy can be used in the slot and moved around, that would help any rookie QB. 

 

Also, Ponder has the benefit of a offensive line that has looked marginally OK and even average (which is IONS ahead of what we thought we&#039;d have).  We have Peterson running like a possessed man, and that&#039;s a good situation for a rookie. 

 

Also, 0 pressure to win because we&#039;re statistically out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I&#8217;m with ya&#8217; man, I thought the same thing last week, give the ball to Ponder, give him 5 games, if he flops or is not showing anything, put in Webb.  I do want to keep McNabb, as a veteran he should know that getting benched isn&#8217;t the end of the world for him.</p>
<p>However, yesterday Aromashodu and Jenkins have showed some things, and Percy is always a good WR.  If there is a rhythm established, and Percy can be used in the slot and moved around, that would help any rookie QB. </p>
<p>Also, Ponder has the benefit of a offensive line that has looked marginally OK and even average (which is IONS ahead of what we thought we&#8217;d have).  We have Peterson running like a possessed man, and that&#8217;s a good situation for a rookie. </p>
<p>Also, 0 pressure to win because we&#8217;re statistically out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.029 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 308/312 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: thevikingage.com @ 2013-05-18 21:38:53 by W3 Total Cache -->