Aug 11, 2012; Seattle, WA, USA; NFL: Seattle Seahawks wide receiver Braylon Edwards (17) stands on the sidelines during the second quarter against the Tennessee Titans at CenturyLink Field. Seattle defeated Tennessee, 27-17. Mandatory Credit: Joe Nicholson-US PRESSWIRE

Should the Vikings Make a Trade for Braylon Edwards?


We’re two days from the NFL trade deadline and there is absolutely no buzz around the Vikings. The only name you hear being thrown around is Dwayne Bowe but that’s just wishful thinking from people who haven’t looked deeply enough into the situation. There’s no way it would make sense for the Vikes to deal for Dwayne Bowe. You’re going to bring him in and then give him the huge long-term contract he’s looking for? And then pay Percy Harvin too? I don’t see it. And it makes no sense for the Vikes to bring him in as a rental either. The Chiefs can let him walk as a free agent and get a third round compensatory pick for him. So that means they’re going to want at least a second round pick in any trade. No way the Vikes give up a second rounder for a rental. Makes no sense.

A certain incident from recent history should also come to mind when anyone thinks about big blockbuster trades in the middle of the season. The Randy Moss debacle. Two years removed from that, you’re going to cough up another relatively high pick for another high-maintenance wide receiver who may or may not help you in the short term and is unlikely to stick around for the long term? Rick Spielman and Zygi Wilf surely learned their lesson from that. No big splashy trades. Only way the Vikes do swing a deal is if it involves a late round pick and a low-salary guy being brought in.

There’s only one person I can think of who remotely fits the criteria the Vikings would probably be thinking about who is currently rumored to be on the block. Big wide receiver with downfield skills (that being their biggest need) who can be had for maybe a sixth and isn’t being paid much and wouldn’t have to be re-signed after the season. Ideally you’d like a good attitude guy but given the low price you’re willing to overlook that. Braylon Edwards is the one guy out there who fits that profile. And as it turns out the Seahawks may be looking to deal Braylon.

This is all in the pure speculation area. But this weekend Edwards was a scratch for the Seahawks despite not being on the injury report all week. The Seahawks claimed Edwards’ knee swelled up at the last minute but the people who cover the team are skeptical of the explanation. The speculation is that Edwards was benched to save him for a trade. And Ian Rapoport reports that there are teams looking at Edwards as a possible trade target. So it makes sense in a “connecting-the-dots” sort of way. But that’s all there is here. There’s no actual steam that I’m aware of.

But would it make sense for the Vikings to make this deal? Well, they really need another wide receiver. That fact was reinforced again last Thursday. Their offense looks dismal and Jerome Simpson probably isn’t the answer. So yes the Vikings’ offense needs an infusion of receiver talent but the reality is that Edwards at this point wouldn’t represent much of an infusion. Maybe he gives you what you need, but that’s a big maybe. The question is, would the Vikes be willing to cough up a late round pick on the faint hope that Braylon Edwards is the missing piece to their puzzle?

It depends on how realistic you think the Vikings’ chances are of making a run in 2012. We’re all sort of surprised to see them sitting at 5-3, but does this mean you should recalibrate your expectations? Should Rick Spielman tweak the long-term plan he’s been so firmly committed to since becoming GM and go for a little short-term reward? Again, it’s all about the draft pick and how highly you value it. Maybe the Vikes think it’s worth a sixth for half a year of Braylon Edwards and the slim hope that he makes enough plays to make a difference. My feeling is that they don’t think this way though. My feeling is that Spielman will stick with the plan come hell or high water…or surprising 5-3 start.

Like The Viking Age on Facebook.
Follow Dan Zinski on Twitter.
Get the all-new FanSided iPhone app.
Want to blog about the Vikings? Fill out the blogger application and join the team. Serious homers, negative types, tape wonks and general wack-jobs all welcome.

Next Vikings Game View full schedule »
Sunday, Sep 77 Sep12:00at St. Louis RamsBuy Tickets
Dick's Sporting Goods presents "Hell Week":

Tags: Minnesota Vikings

  • Pingback: Should the Vikings Make a Trade for Braylon Edwards? | football-feed.com

  • PurplePride1

    If I could wish for just one trade it would be to bring home Larry Fitzgerald. He has been quoted as saying he would “LOVE to play for the Vikings” and he is from and lives in the Twin Cities area in the off season. What an addition he would be and I would believe a great help to a QB (Ponder) who is obviously still learning! Though alas, it is, and probably always will be, just a wish – that won’t come true… no matter how many coins I throw into every fountain I pass.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Cody-Crawford/1731710061 Cody Crawford

    Seattle needs to keep Edwards and play him more

  • mp

    Get a wr, get it now before deadline. If not vikes miss the playoffs. U want ponder to succeed? Give him the weapons

  • purplereign57

    Vikings miss the playoffs anyway, even if they do get to bring in a new WR. Their schedule is way too brutal, having to play the Bears AND the Packers twice, Seattle next Sunday in Seattle. Plus Detroit looks to have found themselves, at least Matthew Stafford has. He put up some phenomenal numbers this past Sunday, and the Vikings still have them again. I’d love to see the Vikings make the playoffs, but with the schedule they have, I just don’t see it happening.

  • mp

    We beat the seahawks and lions before bye and than we split with chicago and GB as well as beat the rams. The bears “overrated” and anyone who has actually wantched their games this year (ME) and keeps up with the North (ME) will tell you the bears played only 1 team with a winning record this year and they lost. So all the BS chatter through ESPN and other silly networks about how great the bears are should look at their schedule. You will see the true bears soon. 7 out of their next 9 games are against winning teams. Bears could easily go 8-8 (you get pressure on Cutler and he folds like a cheap suit…Throw pick after pick), you got to see that against the best D they played this year (green bay) and will see it again 11-19 (san francisco).
    Now the Vikings have had their issues (offense especially due to lack of WR) and I am not claiming they are the best team in the North (Green Bay owns that until someone takes it from them). With that being said, I think if the Vikings get that WR they not only make the playoffs they go deeper than most think. Remember the Vikings play winning teams good. Its the losing teams they lose to. If that stays they do very well in their next 8 games since 6 out of 8 have a winning record :) Of course this is just my opinion. But I think a very educated one by looking at all the facts.

  • Pingback: Should the Vikings Trade for Michael Vick? - The Viking Age - A Minnesota Vikings Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.