Christian Ponder Spouts the Company Line On Percy Harvin

Jan 5, 2013; Green Bay, WI, USA; Minnesota Vikings quarterback Christian Ponder (7) stands on the sidelines before game against the Green Bay Packers during the NFC Wild Card playoff game at Lambeau Field. Mandatory Credit: Benny Sieu-USA TODAY Sports

I see Christian Ponder’s mouth moving but all I hear is Rick Spielman’s voice. Spielman has obviously done a good job schooling Ponder on how to spout the company line. It makes sense. Ponder is the quarterback and as such, one of the faces of the franchise. And he’s a pretty personable, well-spoken guy so he’s going to get a lot of interview requests. The last thing you want is one of your most high-profile players going around doing all these interviews and contradicting his GM on an important matter like Harvin. Gotta have all your ducks in a row.

Spielman doesn’t have to worry. Ponder is happy to toe the line on things like Percy Harvin. When asked about Harvin by KFAN Ponder said:

Obviously we want Percy back. He’s a tremendous player and he’s a Viking. And those are tough shoes to fill and we don’t want to fill them. He’s a heck of a player and a heck of a part of this offense and this team in general. Of course we want him back.

Spielman couldn’t have said it better himself. But of course the words have more authority because they come from a player. Players never swallow their pride, put personal feelings aside and regurgitate the company line. They only speak from the heart. And in his heart, Ponder wants Percy back.

Yeah. And Chris Kluwe wants to spoon with Rush Limbaugh.

Like The Viking Age on Facebook.
Follow Dan Zinski on Twitter.
Get the all-new FanSided iPhone app.
Subsribe to the Fansided Daily Newsletter. Sports news all up in your inbox.

Topics: Minnesota Vikings

Want more from The Viking Age?  
Subscribe to FanSided Daily for your morning fix. Enter your email and stay in the know.
  • tomy

    thats amazing you know how ponder feels

  • I could write better.

    And way to throw in a homosexual joke at the same time. This blog used to be a go-to for me. Dan Zinski is showing how terrible he is at journalism…as well as how unfunny and dumb his opinions are. He gets more readable every single day. I would rather listen to Stephen A. Smith argue with Lou Holtz than read another article by this man.

  • I could write better.

    unreadable*