Dec 15, 2013; Minneapolis, MN, USA; Minnesota Vikings quarterback Matt Cassel (16) looks on following the game against the Philadelphia Eagles at Mall of America Field at H.H.H. Metrodome. The Vikings defeated the Eagles 48-30. Mandatory Credit: Brace Hemmelgarn-USA TODAY Sports

Matt Cassel Is Not the Answer

It’s really nice to see the Vikings offense finally clicking. It’s nice to see Greg Jennings giving the team a return on their rather large investment in him. It’s nice to see Matt Cassel running things with calm professionalism, like a real NFL QB.

Lost draft position aside, it’s nice watching the team win. It’s nice that they’re no longer embarrassing themselves. It’s nice being able to enjoy my Sunday afternoons.

It’s nice that Matt Cassel is having all sorts of wreathes and laurels and things hung around his neck like a great Olympic champion. It’s nice that, after a season of upheaval and nonsense at the quarterback position, there’s finally a guy in there who brings not just competence but occasional excellence.

It’s nice having a QB who knows how to step up against the rush and deliver. Who makes decisive reads. Who can see a blitz coming and find the one-on-one matchups. Who throws an accurate deep ball. Who spreads the ball around, hitting receivers outside the hashes as well as over the middle.

It’s nice that Matt Cassel is demonstrably better than Christian Ponder. It’s nice that Ponder’s mindless defenders have finally been sent running for the hills.

It’s nice that the Vikings hung 48 points on Philadelphia Sunday. 48 freaking points. Like it was 1998 all over again.

It’s nice that, with Cassel in there, the Vikings are no longer so Adrian Peterson-dependent. The Vikings scored 48 with Matt Asiata in the game. Matt. Effing. Asiata.

It’s all nice. But seriously people, Matt Cassel? He’s just not the answer. No way. No chance in hell.

Cassel is the band aid, the Brad Johnson, the Gus Frerotte. He’s the bridge from Ponder to whatever quarterback Rick Spielman picks up in the draft next year. Throw out your favorite names now.

Nothing’s changed just because Matt Cassel has given the Vikings a few solid performances. The long-term plan is still the same. Find a young quarterback who can be the Vikings’ Aaron Rodgers.

Matt Cassel isn’t Aaron Rodgers, he’s Matt Flynn.

Cassel is a journeyman quarterback. He’s the guy who, in four years as the supposed franchise QB in Kansas City, failed to crack 60% completions even once. Who threw 20 touchdowns just once. Who led his team to the playoffs just once. Who got benched for Brady Quinn.

He has veteran savvy, pocket presence, good eyes for reading the field. You know who else has those things? Shaun Hill.

Matt Cassel is not an unknown quantity. He’s not a guy who came out of nowhere. We’ve seen enough of Matt Cassel to know what Matt Cassel is.

He’s a nice backup quarterback. A nice guy to plug in during a trainwreck season and restore a sense of stability and calm. A nice guy to have for a game here, a game there.

The Vikings have been rescued by backup quarterbacks before. Randal Cunningham rescued them after Brad Johnson went down. Jeff George rescued them after Cunningham was awful. Brad Johnson rescued them after Daunte Culpepper blew out his knee. Gus Frerotte rescued them after Tarvaris Jackson was benched for being terrible.

The savior backups listed above all have one thing in common: they did absolutely nothing for the Vikings after their one-season rescue jobs.

The Vikings had no illusions about those previous short-term QBs. They should have no illusions about Matt Cassel.

Arguments about whether Cassel should have started the whole season are fun and make Christian Ponder’s few remaining fans apoplectic with rage, but they are ultimately meaningless. Even had Cassel started, the Vikings may very well have been terrible.

Cassel may have long-since, in the parlance of the wonk, reverted to the mean. He may revert to the mean next week against Cincinnati. The way Cassel played against Philadelphia, such a reversion would be more like an implosion.

Point being, Cassel is going to revert at some point. He didn’t suddenly become Tom Brady. He’s Matt Cassel at the top of a peak.

Cassel has had peaks before. But he’s had valleys too. Really deep, scary, dark valleys filled with werewolves. He got benched for Brady Quinn, people. It doesn’t get darker and scarier than that.

Not trying to bash Matt Cassel, just trying to sprinkle some truth-sugar on everyone’s fun-flakes. I enjoyed Matt Cassel against the Eagles as well. For a minute I let myself get all starry-eyed imagining what the Vikings might have done with Cassel in there all season.

Then I remembered, oh yeah, he’s Matt Cassel. He’s okay. He’s not great.

The quest for quarterback excellence has not ended in Minnesota. It’s taken a little detour into a safe harbor where Matt Cassel stands over everything, smiling benignly, his arm around Greg Jennings in a warm, brotherly embrace.

Soon the path will descend back into the woods, into the thorns and the shadows. Only Rick Spielman can ultimately lead us out of the wilderness of suckiness-to-competence and into the wonderful light of long-term quarterback greatness.

I’m not entirely sure Rick is up to the challenge, but we’ll see. Much is still vague and shadowy. Except one thing:

Matt Cassel. I know he’s not the answer. I know it like I know my own name.

Like The Viking Age on Facebook.
Follow TVA on Twitter.
Subsribe to the Fansided Daily Newsletter. Sports news all up in your inbox.

Next Vikings Game View full schedule »
Sunday, Sep 77 Sep12:00at St. Louis RamsBuy Tickets
Dick's Sporting Goods presents "Hell Week":

Tags: Matt Cassel Minnesota Vikings

  • Ramon Lang

    I disagree. I say it’s his job to lose but still draft a QB to sit behind Cassel. It’s exciting to watch the Viking now. Remember Cassel didn’t have the talent we have here in Minnesota. Go Vikes!!

  • Cool Jack

    You are one negative sports writer.Haven’t you improved over the years…(Guess not).Cassel is still learning and getting better.He shows that he is growing in his profession,(unlike you) and he LOVES MINNESOTA!

  • John Nichols

    And your name is…? Sorry, didn’t mean to ruin your cover.

  • Mark

    “Winning” is not the answer”. That should be your cover. Because so far that’s all Matt Cassel has done. Its commentators like you who have a very BAD concept of what a QB should be that gets us in trouble in the first place! Matt Cassel has shown he is able to make good decisions quickly and execute them. AND he does it on Sunday when it counts. I am not sure where this “backup” mentality has come from, but you are WRONG about it.

    • Chuck

      Hey Danny Boy, Get a clue you freaking MORON!! I don’t recall anyone saying that Cassel is our long term answer, but in case you haven’t noticed or even watched, HE IS WINNING!!!- AND YOU CLAIM YOU ARE A VIKING FAN FROM WAY BACK??? WAY BACK WHEN PAL??

      • jojo

        I agree I hate this guys articles. He’s a lil know it all nerd that actually knows nothing. Funny how you compare what the Vikings need to the Packers. I think your a closet Packer fan. Which is fine but I wish you’d stop tryin to be the voice of the real Viking fan base.

  • David Crosby

    He’s for sure not the answer but he’ll be good for our drafted QB to sit behind and learn from.

  • Laurie K.

    I just checked out this website for the first and last time. I don’t have time for idiots who write inane articles.

    • Kevin Gibbons

      Case in point…. Bengals 42 – Vikings 14. Cassel was back to his old KC form…Terrible.

  • Alecia

    This article speaks the truth. Ever since the Vikes resigned Cassel last month, I’ve been having nightmares just about every night. I know what’s going to happen. He’s going to be just good enough in training camp to get the starting job and then go back to his old KC form during the season and be horrible. It scares me because I don’t want another year like the last one. I don’t want Cassel to start. I would rather have a rookie starting and learning on the job than having to watch Cassel throw low balls that get intercepted. Even Ponder would be better than Cassel. At least Ponder seems to be consistently average – 1 or 2 fumbles/interceptions, a few sacks and 23 points – every single game. Cassel will give you hope in one game by looking like an All-Pro (Steelers, Eagles) and then looks awful and squashes your dreams the next game (Panthers, Bengals) – there’s even an article about it on a KC site that tracked his completion percentages, fumbles/interceptions and points per game over the 2010 season and the chart goes up and down, up and down. I don’t know if I can deal with the ups and downs. He’s too old to be learning new tricks. He’s been in the league for 9 years and still doesn’t know how to throw a ball so it doesn’t get batted down. I’m going be praying and hoping that Ponder gets better (thanks to Norv and a new system) and beats out Cassel for the starting job. Cassel is a career backup and should NOT be starting. Next season is really going to suck bad if he’s the one behind center. I predict 6-10 with Cassel starting, 8-8 with Ponder starting and 4-12 with a rookie starting. If the defense is really on their game and Adrian has another 2012-like season, then I could see going 10-6 with Ponder but I do not see the Vikes having a winning record with Cassel as the starter.