Impact of Michael Pierce opt out on the Minnesota Vikings defense
By Nik Edlund
Hurts Run Defense
The biggest and most obvious impact of Michael Pierce opting out is that it will negatively affect the Vikings’ run defense. This was a unit that already was a coming off a down season, as they finished 13th in the league, allowing 1,728 yards on the ground.
Arguments were made that the reason was Linval Joseph wasn’t healthy all season long, and Shamar Stephen, who was supposed to be stout against the run, struggled. Some of that may be true, and that is why the team went out and brought “The Juggernaut” Michael Pierce in. His specialty in Baltimore was stuffing the run and was looked at as a younger and healthier version of Linval Joseph and a guy who could improve this struggling aspect of the Vikings’ defense.
Without Pierce in there, the Vikings’ run defense takes a major hit. Shamar Stephen could be moved into that nose tackle role and be asked to be the team’s primary run stuffer. Stephen’s play dropped off in a big way last season and there’s no reason to think his performance will be any better in 2020. This is bad news for the Eric Kendricks and company because last year, guards had no problem moving Stephen out of the way and getting to the second level and stopping the linebacker from getting to the ball carrier.
Without Michael Pierce, it’s safe to assume the Vikings run defense will be worse in 2020 and could fall much lower than 13th in the league like it was a season ago.